OpenAI’s rollout of ChatGPT’s Study Mode is reshaping how students approach learning—and raising concerns among professional tutors. Launched earlier this year, Study Mode enables users to engage in structured academic support directly within the AI interface, offering features like step-by-step problem solving, custom quizzes, and instant feedback. Accessible 24/7 and covering a wide range of subjects, this tool is swiftly becoming a preferred study companion for students worldwide, leading many educators and tutors to reevaluate their roles in an AI-integrated educational landscape.
The core appeal of Study Mode lies in its personalization and scalability. Unlike conventional tutoring, which may require scheduling and incur significant costs, ChatGPT provides free or low-cost assistance on demand. This democratization of academic support is particularly transformative for underserved communities, where access to qualified tutors is limited. As students increasingly turn to AI for explanations, practice problems, and test preparation, tutors report a noticeable dip in demand for routine homework help and exam prep—two traditional pillars of their services.
Tutors, however, are not yet obsolete. Many professionals are adapting by focusing on higher-order skills that AI cannot yet replicate—mentorship, emotional support, and complex problem-solving strategies. “What I offer now goes beyond content delivery,” says Rebecca Lin, a private SAT coach in New York. “I work on mindset, motivation, and learning habits. ChatGPT can help with the ‘what,’ but not always the ‘how’ and ‘why.’” This shift reflects a broader trend in education, where human tutors are repositioning themselves as learning strategists rather than mere content conduits.
Data also suggest that while AI tools enhance access, they may not always ensure deep understanding. A 2025 study by the EdTech Research Collaborative found that students using ChatGPT alone were 18% more likely to skip foundational steps in problem-solving, potentially leading to superficial learning. This has prompted some educators to integrate AI as a complement rather than a replacement. Schools and tutoring centers are exploring hybrid models, where ChatGPT handles drill work and human tutors guide conceptual mastery and metacognition.
As AI continues embedding itself in learning ecosystems, the tutoring profession faces both challenge and opportunity. Embracing AI not as a competitor but as a collaborator may be key to long-term relevance. The future of tutoring may depend less on delivering answers and more on fostering independent thinking in a world where answers are only a prompt away.
Cybericonic 